Thursday, March 8, 2012

Obama Failure Watch: International Approval Trumps Congressional Approval

An "international legal basis":



Scary stuff... And it's even scarier when you consider that Eric Holder recently asserted that the Obama admin has the authority to kill American citizens living overseas without due process:

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. asserted on Monday that it is lawful for the government to kill American citizens if officials deem them to be operational leaders of Al Qaeda who are planning attacks on the United States and if capturing them alive is not feasible.

“Given the nature of how terrorists act and where they tend to hide, it may not always be feasible to capture a United States citizen terrorist who presents an imminent threat of violent attack,” Mr. Holder said in a speech at Northwestern University’s law school. “In that case, our government has the clear authority to defend the United States with lethal force.”

While Mr. Holder is not the first administration official to address the targeted killing of citizens — the Pentagon’s general counsel, Jeh Johnson, did so last month at Yale Law School, for example — it was notable for the nation’s top law enforcement official to declare that it is constitutional for the government to kill citizens without any judicial review under certain circumstances. Mr. Holder’s remarks about the targeted killing of United States citizens were a centerpiece of a speech describing legal principles behind the Obama administration’s counterterrorism policies.

“Some have argued that the president is required to get permission from a federal court before taking action against a United States citizen who is a senior operational leader of Al Qaeda or associated forces,” Mr. Holder said. “This is simply not accurate. ‘Due process’ and ‘judicial process’ are not one and the same, particularly when it comes to national security. The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process.”

Source: Outside the Beltway


Now, I'm all for targeting terrorists who we are at war with. But the Obama administration has shown a consistent reticence to use terms like "war" or "victory," opting instead to use terms like "overseas contingency operation."

Furthermore, the Obama administration - specifically, Eric Holder - has been incapable of using terms like "terrorist" or "radical Islam." Remember this?



Also, keep in mind that Eric Holder has made a living off of defending Islamic terrorists:



It's also interesting to note that the administration that has consistently fought to close Guantanemo Bay - a holding facility for radical Islamic terrorists - is suddenly proud to proclaim that they can kill terrorists - US citizens, no less - without Congressional consent or due process.

So now, we're to believe Eric Holder and President Obama are suddenly gung-ho in the quest to rid the world of radical Islamic terrorists and we need to accept their self-proclaimed right to do so without Congressional consent.

Riiiiiight....

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Obama Failure Watch: Obama's Latest Apology (Afghanistan Edition)



The saga of President Obama's latest apology has all the makings of a classic Obama failure:
And if you think THAT'S bad, it seems that Obama's Afghanistan apology has made it difficult for him to apologize to Pakistan. Apparently, the administration was just about ready to issue a formal apology for targeting terrorists in Pakistan with drone strikes. For now, the Pakistan apology will have to wait.

Great job, Mr. President!

ObamaCare Costs Up $111 BILLION DOLLARS!

Who's ready for some more bad news about the skyrocketing costs and predictably epic mismanagement of ObamaCare?
Cost estimates for a key part of President Obama's health care overhaul law have ballooned by $111 billion from last year's budget, and a senior Republican lawmaker on Friday demanded an explanation.

...

Administration officials say the explanation lies in budget technicalities and that there are no significant changes in the program.

The revised numbers, buried deep in the president's budget, stumped lawmakers and some administration officials for most of the week. At a congressional hearing Tuesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who is in charge of carrying out the health care law, indicated she was unaware of the changes.

At issue are subsidies that will be provided under the health care law to help middle class people buy private coverage in new state insurance markets that will open for business in 2014.
Last year's budget estimated the cost of the aid to be $367 billion from 2014-2011. This year's budget puts it at $478 billion over the same time period.

"This staggering increase ... cannot be explained by legislative changes or new economic assumptions, and therefore must reflect substantial changes in underlying assump
tions regarding the program's ... costs," Camp wrote Friday in a letter to Sebelius and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner.

Republicans say they're concerned that either the estimated cost of the insurance has gone up, or that the administration has determined many more people will be losing employer coverage and going into the new government-subsidized markets, which will be called exchanges.

Administration officials say the big increase from last year's estimates is no cause for alarm and that the administration is not forecasting an erosion of employer coverage or higher insurance costs.

Source: FoxNews

ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN BILLION DOLLARS?

Nothing to see here. Move along...


Thursday, March 1, 2012

Regulation of the Day: Obama Shuts Down Five Coal Plants in PA

Remember when then-candidate Obama promised to bankrupt coal plants? Ever since then, he's unleashed the EPA's Lisa Jackson on power plants and entire industries, in an effort to make his promises come true.

Looks like everything is going according to plan:
GenOn Energy Inc. plans to close five of its older coal-fired power plants in Pennsylvania over the next four years.

The company, based in Houston, said Wednesday that tough new environmental rules make it unprofitable to operate the plants, which generate a total of 3,140 megawatts of electricity. The plants are in Portland, Shawville, Titus, New Castle and Elrama. Two plants in Ohio and one in New Jersey will also be closed. The company said the timeframes are subject to further review based on market conditions.

Source: HotAir
Score one for Lisa Jackson! Actually, score FIVE for Lisa Jackson!

Steven Chu: Anti-Energy, Anti-American

You've got to hand it to Energy Secretary Steven Chu. He may be an anti-growth egghead, but he isn't afraid to discuss his anti-American ideology. In the face of rising gas prices, Chu choo chooses to focus instead on government-funded green energy boondoggles:
“We agree there is great suffering when the price of gasoline increases in the United States, and so we are very concerned about this,” said Chu, speaking to the House Appropriations energy and water subcommittee. “As I have repeatedly said, in the Department of Energy, what we’re trying to do is diversify our energy supply for transportation so that we have cost-effective means.”

Chu specifically cited a reported breakthrough announced Monday by Envia Systems, which received funding from DOE’s ARPA-E, that could help slash the price of electric vehicle batteries.

He also touted natural gas as “great” and said DOE is researching how to reduce the cost of compressed natural gas tanks for vehicles.

High gasoline prices will make research into such alternatives more urgent, Chu said.

“But is the overall goal to get our price” of gasoline down, asked Nunnelee.

“No, the overall goal is to decrease our dependency on oil, to build and strengthen our economy,” Chu replied. “We think that if you consider all these energy policies, including energy efficiency, we think that we can go a long way to becoming less dependent on oil and [diversifying] our supply and we’ll help the American economy and the American consumers.”

Source: Politico

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Obama Wages War on Military Families, Unions Unaffeced

Question: What happens when President Obama's anti-military orientation collides with his lust for socialist healthcare?

Answer:
The Obama administration’s proposed defense budget calls for military families and retirees to pay sharply more for their healthcare, while leaving unionized civilian defense workers’ benefits untouched. The proposal is causing a major rift within the Pentagon, according to U.S. officials. Several congressional aides suggested the move is designed to increase the enrollment in Obamacare’s state-run insurance exchanges.

The disparity in treatment between civilian and uniformed personnel is causing a backlash within the military that could undermine recruitment and retention.

The proposed increases in health care payments by service members, which must be approved by Congress, are part of the Pentagon’s $487 billion cut in spending. It seeks to save $1.8 billion from the Tricare medical system in the fiscal 2013 budget, and $12.9 billion by 2017.

Many in Congress are opposing the proposed changes, which would require the passage of new legislation before being put in place.

“We shouldn’t ask our military to pay our bills when we aren’t willing to impose a similar hardship on the rest of the population,” Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and a Republican from California, said in a statement to the Washington Free Beacon. “We can’t keep asking those who have given so much to give that much more.”

Administration officials told Congress that one goal of the increased fees is to force military retirees to reduce their involvement in Tricare and eventually opt out of the program in favor of alternatives established by the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.

Source: Free Beacon via Drudge Report

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Geithner: Americans Need to Pay for the Privilege of Being American

Talk about a perversion of the concept of patriotism. Timmy Geithner - the diminutive egghead who can't figure out how to pay taxes himself - would like you to know that you should be paying for the "privilege" of being an American: